Thursday, July 9, 2009

He'll bring them death - and they will love him for it!

In “Gladiator,” Senator Gracchus understood of the new President…uh, Emperor: “He will bring them death, and they will love him for it.” He called the ignorant populace, the “Roman mob,” who would watch their new leader “take away their freedom, and still they'll roar.” It’s as if he was prophesying of today’s American mob so enamored with their hallowed President that they ignore current events, and are mesmerized by the liberal media who’s daily Obama admonition is, “O come let us adore him.”

The Obama death stimulus plan is very much in line with his Proverbs 17:15 worldview of acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent. The Lord specifically calls this paradigm DETESTABLE. “OBAMA LIES—WHO DIES?” The innocent die, and according to scripture, the Lord takes this all very serious. At the beginning of His revelation of the law, in Exodus, He admonishes, “Do not kill the innocent and righteous, for I will not acquit the wicked.” This is God’s order. Of course, the mission of the Prince of this World is to thwart and distort God’s order. So when God commanded obedience from Adam and Eve, the devil deceived them. [“THE DEVIL LIED—WHO DIED?] Man went from innocence to a state of condemnation. And we should realize that sin affects us on a national level as well, “Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.” (Proverbs 14:34)

I’m aware that I am making a serious charge here against the President of the United States. President Obama’s policies will ultimately result in the death of the innocent. So, God will bless us because…?

Many of the initiatives and policies of the Obama administration bring death to innocent parties, and refuge to those who are guilty. If you want to deduce what Barack Obama’s position is on any number of issues, just ask yourself: “Could this result in the death of innocent people?” If “yes,” there is a good possibility the President supports that initiative.

  • The Obama administration is pursuing stricter gun laws. (Sounds obviously noble, right?) For those who need clarification, this means that legitimate gun users (law enforcement, hunters, etc.) would have a harder time obtaining a firearm. Now, the criminals who actually use these weapons for crime and murder, would not be affected by legislation because, as I have witnessed in my own “hood” growing up, thugs don’t go to legitimate gun shops brandishing ID to obtain their "glocks." The result of strict gun control legislation will be that the “bad” guys will gain an advantage.
  • According to a report in the Washington Times—hardly a conservative paper—the Obama-ites are quietly taking steps to shut down a program that would qualify commercial pilots to carry firearms in order to protect against possible terrorism. “Instead, it is using the money to hire additional field inspectors to help discipline pilots who step out of line.” This pilot training initiative was a $2 million program. I guess so called stimulus items such as $98 million for a polar icebreaker - always one of my concerns when I ride the Circle Line - are much more important. They seem concerned that armed pilots might actually protect innocent passengers. We wouldn't want that, would we?
  • The F-22 Raptor and the F-35 Lightning II are new jet fighters that are supposed to replace the aging F-15 Eagle and F-16 Fighting Falcon. This would mean continual American air superiority. The Obama administration has made it clear it will veto any defense bill that includes money for these aircrafts. Opponents argue, “Next-generation tanker and bomber decisions today will have tremendous impact on our security in the future,” said one senior Defense official. Democratic Congressman Barney Frank, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, agrees with the president that the F-22 is “an example of unnecessary military spending.” Bottom-line: we would be less safe and our enemies would be better equipped as we eliminate what Frank calls "unnecessary waste."
  • The Conscience Clause protects doctors and faith-based hospitals from performing procedures that violate their beliefs. Basically, if I am a doctor that opposes abortion, I am not forced to conduct one. Simple. Right? However, the Obama administration is moving to repeal the "conscience clause.” What is their friggin’ obsession with killing babies?!? So now I could be criminalized because I am opposed to killing babies? CNN Reports: “The Obama administration plans to reverse a regulation from late in the Bush administration allowing health-care workers to refuse to provide services based on moral objections, an official said Friday. The Provider Refusal Rule was proposed by the Bush White House in August and enacted on January 20, the day President Barack Obama took office. It expanded on a 30-year-old law establishing a "conscience clause" for "health-care professionals who don't want to perform abortions."
  • President Obama issued an executive order that overturned President Bush's policy and opened the floodgates for funding more EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH, that actually creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos. “They actually encourage scientists to destroy preborn human life, courtesy of $10 billion in federal stimulus money…The regulations virtually guarantee that many more living human embryos will be destroyed for research,’ said Carrie Gordon Earll, senior bioethics analyst for Focus on the Family. ‘This policy also creates a tax-dollar incentive for scientists to destroy human embryos.’" Why is this administration so hell bent on destroying life. What manner of evil is this?
  • All this crap - sorry, STUFF - despite recent breakthroughs in adult stem cell research which should really make the embryonic stem cells controversy a thing of the past. “The ethical dilemma [of embryonic stem cell research]can be bypassed altogether if adult mammalian cells are reprogrammed to form iPS, which are cells almost identical to those from embryonic stem cells but which come from adult tissue instead of embryos, and the same results can be obtained.” [Livescience.com] Adult stem cells already treat over 70 diseases. Embryonic stem cells? In 25 years so far, NONE. NADA. Yet Obama is forcing tax payers to fund it. The only real result here will be death of innocent life.
  • One day after the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, President Obama has signed an order to lift the Mexico City policy, a Reagan-era policy that prohibits taxpayer funds from going to organizations that promote or perform abortions overseas. What really, is their friggin’ obsession with killing babies?!? “The Mexico City policy was considered by many to be one of the most effective pro-life policies of the Bush and Reagan administrations. International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), one of the most pro-abortion organizations in the world, told the BBC today that under the Bush administration, thanks to the Mexico City Policy, the organization had lost more than $100m in funding.” [OneNewsNow.com 1/23/09]
  • “Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush all refused to fund the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) because the organization helps China execute its one-child policy. But Barack Obama, like Bill Clinton before him, has pledged to reverse the course of his Republican predecessor and fund the UNFPA. […] Apparently, if thousands of Chinese women are forced to abort their unborn children—and baby girls, in particular, are targeted for death—well that's just collateral damage.” [Weekly Standard] What is their friggin’ obsession with killing babies?!?
  • President Obama selected Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to lead the Health and Human Services Department. “There is nobody in America that is more radically sold out to the abortion lobby than Kathleen Sebelius.” [CitizenLink] The pro-abortion governor is in a position to profoundly influence federal and state policies on abortion, rights of conscience, bioethics and end-of-life issues. She is also instrumental in distributing federal funding to abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood. “Appointing someone who is the most pro-abortion governor in this country to be the person in charge of health care for our entire country is really just outrageous,” said Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of Americans United for Life. She has said herself that “certain inalienable rights are not applied in utero." What is their friggin’ obsession with killing babies?!?
  • The President did not invite one single prolife health care advocate to his 2009 White House conference on health care, although it was chock full of pro-abortion advocates.
    Obama’s choice for deputy attorney general is David Ogden. Ogden opposes restrictions on abortion and pornography, and has represented Playboy and Penthouse in court. In a brief he filed before the U.S. Supreme Court supporting child pornographer Stephen Knox, who possessed sexually explicit videos of children, Ogden argued that because the children's genitalia were partially covered by clothing, such exploitation is protected by the First Amendment. "It's very disappointing that the U.S. Senate would confirm [Ogden] who has such a long record of both pro-abortion, pro-death, and a casual attitude towards pornography and protecting minors when it comes to abortion." Tom McClusky, vice president of government affairs at FRC Action
  • Obama describes himself as a “fierce advocate of equality for gay men and lesbians.” Obama will likely be the first major candidate for president to support same-sex marriage, even though he states he believes marriage should be between a man and a woman. If only words and actions met. “Obama opposes a federal constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman. He opposes the federal Defense of Marriage Act that prevents states from having to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. And he supports activist judges of the sort who find the California court’s reasoning congenial.” Rich Lowery, NRO Editor, May 23, 2008 “We’ve elected probably the most pro-gay president in history; he’s very good on the issues…” said Steven Elmendorf, a gay Democratic lobbyist. Sexual perversion leads to death (cf. Sodom and Gomorrah). Innocent children suffer when God’s design is perverted. Innocent children are being taught the abomination of homosexuality is normal and morally acceptable. That makes God out to be a liar. Innocent children will have to read books like “King and King,” a children’s book (ages 4-8) where two male princes are married and even kiss in the book. This is already being given out in some schools. Innocent children will have to endure sex education classes accompanied by homosexual themes. Innocent children will not have the opportunity of having both a mom and a dad. “Sin…leads to death.”James 1:15

    I have to stop writing. This is already pretty long. But you see some examples of what I mean when I charge that the policies president Obama lead to the death of innocent entities. I did not even go into closing a prison that houses terrorists and letting them lose to cause further harm to innocents and many other issues. I am just trying to point out that we are headed in a very wrong direction, and I pray that God’s people especially, worship and adore Jesus alone, who is the Truth. I pray that those who call themselves Christians will strive to protect the innocent. "I have sinned," he said, "for I have betrayed innocent blood." Judas.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

brother, i agree wholeheartedly with the fact you're pointing out here~ this ship is sinking & God's people have to wake up and stand up! I thank God thats you're brave enough to say it like it is and educate those that are not aware of all these issues. Love you brother~~ mimi morales

Anonymous said...

I see at the end you say you have to stop writing, well I had to stop reading otherwise I was going to loose breakfast! God help us!! He is our only hope. Also, I want to thank you for taking a stand and hopefully, prayerfully, informing those that are searching for the truth. Your Brother in Christ, Greg Rhyne